Britney Jing Benched by Hustler Casino Live

This is not the first time Britney Jing has been involved in a public poker controversy.
The power of AllInBritney is strong and perhaps this commotion surrounding her persona is exactly what she wants.

Or, she is getting heat because she is a woman in an industry dominated by men. 

Earlier in 2026, Jing was removed from a livestreamed high stakes cash game during the WSOP in Las Vegas after questions were raised around compliance and source of funds.

That incident was not presented as a cheating allegation. The issue was whether she could satisfy the requirements around the money she wanted to use in the game. Jing later maintained that the funds were legitimate and traceable, while the situation still became another example of her name appearing in a sensitive high stakes poker dispute.

Not a fact, just some rumours.
The current controversy has also reopened older accusations around private cash games.
Several players and poker figures have discussed claims that Jing was involved in arranging or backing players in private games where wealthy recreational players may not have fully understood the financial relationships between others at the table.

Some critics have used the term “pig butchering” to describe those alleged setups, particularly in relation to games said to have taken place in Shanghai.

This is a nicer phrasing of the allegations. Some have called this 7-on-1-pokerbang.
7 staked or backed horses teaming up against 1 whale. 
Hey, everyone needs food on the table and some people just wants to hustle.
Not claiming this is the case here, obviously.

House backed players are tough to accept. It is more common then you think, any big tournaments with potential overlays always seem to boost the entries with last minute flip satellites or players late regging in the last possible flight.

Stables. What are you going to do?

Britney has been accused of staking players in cash game sessions where she herself has been playing. That, should it be true, is a conflict of interest and will definately have a huge impact on the game itself.
But, and once again, distinction matters: having undisclosed action in several players is an integrity issue but not automatically same as collusion. Unless, as an example, HCL had this point as a no-no in their T&Cs.

One thing is certain, it is not very uncommon.